openssl097a package retirement

Bill Nottingham notting at
Mon Nov 12 17:15:49 UTC 2007

Debarshi 'Rishi' Ray (debarshi.ray at said: 
> I am afraid you got me wrong here. I did not use the term "compatible"
> to mean license compatibility. I wanted to know whether an application
> which dlopens could safely use
> instead, without causing any API/ABI breakage?

'Not necessarily'. It's why the soname changes.


More information about the fedora-devel-list mailing list