Review queue/FESCo after the merge
Christopher Aillon
caillon at redhat.com
Fri Nov 16 12:40:31 UTC 2007
On 11/15/2007 06:24 PM, Thorsten Leemhuis wrote:
>
> On 15.11.2007 12:41, Christopher Aillon wrote:
>> Then we should consider updating our guidelines. This brings up a good
>> point, too. If a given package guideline exists to work around bugs
>> like this in the future, the guideline really must reference the bug #
>> so it can be easier to revisit at a future date.
>
> Agreed, albeit I'm not sure if the exact bug # is needed -- the
> information "need in FC > foo and RHEL > bar" is the important one. And
> maintaining that properly is more important due to EPEL, as we'll still
> have to deal with EPEL for EL4 for some years.
Well for bugs that aren't yet fixed, we need the number. And a
reference to the guideline from the bug.
More information about the fedora-devel-list
mailing list