Review queue/FESCo after the merge

Jesse Keating jkeating at
Sun Nov 18 23:55:14 UTC 2007

On Sun, 18 Nov 2007 21:43:05 +0100
Nicolas Mailhot <nicolas.mailhot at> wrote:

> I stated when I started the SIG I didn't want the glorious leader
> position, so I won't pretend I speak for it, and I'll only object for
> the three affected packages I maintain or co-maintain.
> If this change is to be done I'll insist his author explain and defend
> it on the SIG list, then write a formal FPC proposal, and get this
> proposal approved all the way up.
> This is a "fix"¹ in search of a problem², and while I've been known to
> make gratuitous changes to make a point too³, I've limited myself to
> my own packages, and I'll appreciate the same restraint in my fellow
> Fedorans.

So it would seem we're /not/ in agreement on this point.  Thorsten, are
you trying to fix a real problem, or just trying to ensure everything
follows a guideline regarding exit failures in %post scriptlets?

Jesse Keating
Fedora -- All my bits are free, are yours?
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <>

More information about the fedora-devel-list mailing list