WTF? Inaccessible bug reports?

[Daniel P. Berrange]

On Tue, Nov 20, 2007 at 03:05:50PM +0100, Olivier Galibert wrote:
>   You are not authorized to access bug #260621.
> 
> Right.  Black-on-red too, somebody has seen too many crappy hollywood
> movies.  Surprised it doesn't blink.

Some bugs are restricted because they have security implications which
are under embargo, or they are RHEL bugs with customer or partner
data in them which can't be made public due to obvious confidentiality 
requirements.

> So I'm trying to find out why David Cantrell decided to make my life
> hell on 2007-09-04 by disabling any possibility of static ip when
> using kickstart and the changelog refers to bug #260621 which I'm
> somehow not allowed to see.
> 
> So I am supposed to guess why the hell such a change was made how?

Perhaps you could be polite and simply ask on this list why the particular
RPM change was made, rather than ranting about being unable to view a BZ.

Dan.
-- 
|=- Red Hat, Engineering, Emerging Technologies, Boston.  +1 978 392 2496 -=|
|=-           Perl modules: http://search.cpan.org/~danberr/              -=|
|=-               Projects: http://freshmeat.net/~danielpb/               -=|
|=-  GnuPG: 7D3B9505   F3C9 553F A1DA 4AC2 5648 23C1 B3DF F742 7D3B 9505  -=|