WTF? Inaccessible bug reports?

[Jesse Keating]

On Thu, 22 Nov 2007 17:21:35 +0100
Olivier Galibert <galibert at pobox.com> wrote:

> Well, I need Core back.  Not Core as in "my package is holier than
> yours", that we can do without, but core as in "all these packages
> work well together, can all be installed together, and you will be
> able to do mostly anything with them".  Jesse Keating told last june
> on the list, after yet another of my bitchings, that the "Fedora"
> spin, aka the packages on the DVD, were supposed to replace that.  The
> F8 release shows it's not the case anymore.
> 
> I'm not sure how technically and socially a core-like package
> selection could be organized.  Any experience in that area?

A "core" is as good as the people testing it can make it.  Modulo the
multilib conflicts which is a problem of it's own, what issues do you
have?  I'm open for more discussion on what all should land on the DVD,
note /discussion/, not demands.

-- 
Jesse Keating
Fedora -- All my bits are free, are yours?
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/fedora-devel-list/attachments/20071122/524199f5/attachment.sig>