[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]

Re: RSSOwl status?



On 27/11/2007, Jack Tanner <ihok hotmail com> wrote:
> As far as I can tell by googling around, RSSOwl 1.x got dropped at some
> point because it depended on iText, which had licensing issues. RSSOwl 2.x,
> which is not yet out, will dispense with iText, and we can have it back then.
>
> In the meantime, RSSOwl 2.x is up to Milestone 6, and iText's homepage
> talks about a dual LGPL/MPL license. It'd be nice if we could could we have
> RSSOwl in some form now. Either 2M6 or 1.2 with the (seemingly kosher) iText
> would be great.

iText is still not useable in Fedora - see the recent discussions on
this mailing list.


[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]