Summary of the 2007-10-02 Packaging Committee meeting

[Jonathan Underwood]

On 03/10/2007, Patrice Dumas <pertusus at free.fr> wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 03, 2007 at 01:31:48PM +0100, Jonathan Underwood wrote:
> > On 02 Oct 2007 13:12:31 -0500, Jason L Tibbitts III <tibbs at math.uh.edu> wrote:
> > > Issues pending FESCO ratification:
> > >  * Naming of TeX-related packages:
> > >   * http://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-packaging/2007-September/msg00066.html
> > >   * Accepted (5 - 0)
> >
> > Presumably package names should be changed for F8?
>
> Certainly not. We are past test3, texlive is still not in, and it is not
> a big deal. Additionally, it would be nice to have the virtual provides
> also in, jindrich was inclined to add them, before we adjust the
> packages. F9 would be a more realistic target, in my opinion, without
> pressure on the maintainers to change names in case they have more
> important business to do.

OK, good - thanks for clarification.