samba license change

Simo Sorce ssorce at redhat.com
Wed Oct 10 12:30:05 UTC 2007


On Wed, 2007-10-10 at 12:20 +0200, Ralf Corsepius wrote:
> On Wed, 2007-10-10 at 11:51 +0200, Nicolas Mailhot wrote:
> > Le Mer 10 octobre 2007 07:10, Ralf Corsepius a écrit :
> > 
> > > Well, it matters very much to individuals if they want to endanger
> > > themselves by the uncertainties of a "brand new" license a political
> > > organization with controversial (some say "fundamentalist zealotic")
> > > attitude (the FSF) tries to enforce.
> > 
> > Then don't link to GPLv3 code. Simple. Easy.
> False - This is not easy. 
> 
> > Don't ask for the freedom to make licensing choices then deny it to
> > other projects because they happen to make a different choice than
> > yours (and incidentally they've been involved in actual trials which
> > are likely to be more relevant to them than your anti-FSF paranoïa)
> I prefer to rely on existing precedences which had been approved by
> courts, and not a political party's wishful thinking.

Simply put, can you stop trolling?

This is not an anti-GPLv3 trollfest, we have real things to discuss.
You are just distracting with irrelevant trolling arguments.

Did I say trolling? :-)

Simo.




More information about the fedora-devel-list mailing list