Multiarch conflicts on devel packages with %doc files

[seth vidal]

On Sun, 2007-10-21 at 20:04 -0700, Christopher Stone wrote:
> On 10/21/07, seth vidal <skvidal at fedoraproject.org> wrote:
> >
> > On Sun, 2007-10-21 at 09:01 -0700, Christopher Stone wrote:
> > > On 10/20/07, Todd Zullinger <tmz at pobox.com> wrote:
> > > > Eric Sandeen wrote:
> > > > > And I'm afraid this does apply to you, Christopher, I should have
> > > > > looked more closely.  If for example you diff
> > > > > classcal3d_1_1RefCounted.html between x86_64 and x86, you'll see
> > > > > this.
> > > > >
> > > > > (pseudodiff):
> > > > >
> > > > > -<a class="anchor" name="fe153da64cbdd43c0ab660327001a25e"></a>
> > > > > +<a class="anchor" name="23e13384bbde2cbd2f302e6ad70eae2b"></a>
> > > >
> > > > Could docs like this be split out into noarch subpackages?  Or perhaps
> > > > pre-generated and then installed from a Source1: line so that they'd
> > > > match across arches?
> > >
> > > Wow, please don't ask me to do this, the bug is clearly yum or doxygen.
> >
> > rpmlib is complaining about the files not matching. Not yum. And I
> > actually don't think this is a bug in rpm, either.
> 
> Except for the fact that you can install both arches just fine using
> rpm, but it fails with yum.

really? That's interesting. It should be consistent b/c at the point
where the error is coming from in yum, all of the operation is inisde
rpmlib.

-sv