yum-updatesd in F8?
Arthur Pemberton
pemboa at gmail.com
Tue Oct 9 20:52:57 UTC 2007
On 10/9/07, Luke Macken <lmacken at redhat.com> wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 09, 2007 at 12:49:00PM +0100, Christopher Brown wrote:
> > On 09/10/2007, Mike C <mike.cohler at gmail.com> wrote:
> > > Can someone say if yum-updatesd will be in F8 final
> >
> > Yes.
> >
> > - and if so whether it
> > > really works or not?
> >
> > Yes. It really WORKSFORME.
> >
> > > It never did for me in F7.
> >
> > Sorry to hear it. I have also found it flaky in F7 but there is always
> > bugzilla and rawhide to test from if you can.
>
> yum-updatesd has seen *significant* improvements since F7,
> especially with memory usage.
>
> Private + Shared = RAM used Program
> 6.6 MiB + 2.0 MiB = 8.6 MiB yum-updatesd
1) Does yum-updatesd still block yum and piruit? Causes newbies some headaches.
2) Does the GUI (pup?) work in KDE?
3) Is there a silent download, interactive install mode?
--
Fedora 7 : sipping some of that moonshine
( www.pembo13.com )
More information about the fedora-devel-list
mailing list