The gstreamer third way

[Nicolas Mailhot]

Le jeudi 11 octobre 2007 à 19:12 +0000, Kevin Kofler a écrit :
> Nicu Buculei <nicu_fedora <at> nicubunu.ro> writes:
> > No. The ugly gstreamer plugins don't have a license problem, but a 
> > patents problem and this problem apply only on certain parts of the 
> > world, there are other parts where they are perfectly fine from any 
> > point of view.
> 
> Yet third-party repositories are happily distributing proprietary kmod-nvidia 
> modules linked against the GPLv2 kernel, which isn't any more legal than 
> distributing a GPLv2 kio_smb linked against a GPLv3 Samba would be.

Last I checked they're not distributing both kmod-nvidia and kernels in
the same repo

-- 
Nicolas Mailhot
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 197 bytes
Desc: Ceci est une partie de message num?riquement sign?e
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/fedora-devel-list/attachments/20071011/3ff1e280/attachment.sig>