Request for Comments: Proposed changes to Fedora development cycle
Nicolas Mailhot
nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net
Tue Oct 16 18:12:18 UTC 2007
Le mardi 16 octobre 2007 à 19:45 +0200, Hans de Goede a écrit :
> Jesse Keating wrote:
> > Here is the problem, if the build is not deemed "good" by rel-eng to be
> > in the release after the release candidate where does it go?
>
> Why does this deeming good have to be done by rel-eng? Thats creating both a
> bottle-neck and a hoop to jump through.
Because ultimately rel-eng is the Fedora entity responsible for making
good releases, because everyone will blame them if things go wrong, so I
sure hope they have veto power at critical release time
> And yes I want to see "benign simple fixes, with little chance to regressions"
> go into the release even once we've released an RC, that way we the actual
> release will be better (less bugs) and we avoid having a slew of updates right
> after the release.
Join rel-eng, you want a share of the power, get a share of the blame.
> I know some people are very much against this and want only critical fixes at
> this point, to them I say stop thinking Fedora Core and start thinking Fedora
> Extras.
This is not FE vs FC, this is having someone in charge at release time
and you won't find a lot of people here to say rel-eng or Jesse is
abusing this power.
Many thanks to the rel-eng team! Many thanks for herding ungrateful
cats!
--
Nicolas Mailhot
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 197 bytes
Desc: Ceci est une partie de message num?riquement sign?e
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/fedora-devel-list/attachments/20071016/4a855349/attachment.sig>
More information about the fedora-devel-list
mailing list