[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]
Re: Provides/Obsoletes question
- From: Michael Schwendt <mschwendt tmp0701 nospam arcor de>
- To: fedora-devel-list redhat com
- Subject: Re: Provides/Obsoletes question
- Date: Tue, 16 Oct 2007 20:19:08 +0200
On Tue, 16 Oct 2007 18:35:25 +0200, Jos Vos wrote:
> In RHEL5 (probably also in Fedora), pidgin obsoletes "gaim < 999:1"
> (epoch 999 !!!). If someone can explain me why this is better than
> just obsoleting "gaim", please tell me. IMHO, this only makes sense
> if a "gaim >= 999:1" might ever exist. I don't think so :-).
Versioned Obsoletes are superior, because they occupy only a specific
EVR range of a package namespace. For your example of "gaim < 999:1",
you can reintroduce a package with the name "gaim" (suppose it's a
different piece of software) by giving it an EVR higher than 999:1.
On the contrary, the unversioned "Obsoletes: gaim" blocks re-entry
of a package with the name "gaim", regardless of its EVR.
[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]