If you are maintinaing of developing a Fedora Package.

Nicolas Mailhot nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net
Sat Oct 20 14:19:49 UTC 2007


Le samedi 20 octobre 2007 à 14:59 +0200, Alexander Boström a écrit :

> Would putting the policy in the package actually help make my problem
> easier? Since I don't understand the problem fully and don't know how to
> fix it, I would still need to talk to the people who know SELinux well.

You can talk and you can offload. Most people just offload so selinux is
only mastered by a little core.

> That means it's not really a problem to let them update the central
> policy files instead of me doing whatever needs to be done in the
> package.

That's a problem for everything that is not 100% Fedora, such a spins
with custom modifications corporations or universities create. Since the
current system is overly centralised, they just disable selinux by
default.

And its not their fault it's the fault of a model that deems having a
few experts and letting everyone else in the dark is acceptable.

-- 
Nicolas Mailhot
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 197 bytes
Desc: Ceci est une partie de message num?riquement sign?e
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/fedora-devel-list/attachments/20071020/b6191905/attachment.sig>


More information about the fedora-devel-list mailing list