rawhide report: 20071030 changes
John Poelstra
poelstra at redhat.com
Tue Oct 30 15:06:39 UTC 2007
Jesse Keating wrote:
> On Tue, 30 Oct 2007 14:37:00 +0100
> Hans de Goede <j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl> wrote:
>
>> And again I see a lot of fix multilib conflicts changelog entries,
>> wasn't this supposed to be F-9 material and if they are how does this
>> relate to the freeze?
>>
>> I've fixed quite a few packages for this too, but all the bug reports
>> I got said it would be nice if this were to be fixed for F-9.
>
> Some overachieving maintainers requested that these be fixed in F-8,
> particularly if it would effect yum upgrades from F7 or otherwise part
> of a standard package set. Since we were taking in bugfixes we went
> ahead and accepted these requests for inclusion. However as per my
> email just a moment ago today is the last day for such freedom in
> requesting bugfixes. Even today I'm going to give people a harder time
> on getting stuff in.
>
For those following along at home... which "scheduled milestone"
reflects the "last day of freedom"? I don't see anything for October
30th here
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Releases/8/Schedule
John
More information about the fedora-devel-list
mailing list