changelogs in packages and space use
tgl at redhat.com
Sat Sep 1 04:30:11 UTC 2007
Bill Nottingham <notting at redhat.com> writes:
> That's my point, though - how is a release method where each release
> you offer *less* functionality to the user a good thing?
Are we offering *less* functionality, or *different* functionality?
There's certainly a zero-sum game involved when you're discussing
what you can put on a given-size CD.
I'm +1 for dropping blow-by-blow changelogs out of that limited
footprint --- the people who care about those details probably care
about access to the source code too, and I don't see anyone insisting
that we ship full source on livecd.
I'm also +1 for the discipline of packing as much functionality as
possible onto limited space. But detailed changelogs seem to me
to not qualify as critical functionality.
regards, tom lane
More information about the fedora-devel-list