David G. Mackay
mackay_d at bellsouth.net
Tue Sep 4 14:39:42 UTC 2007
On Tue, 2007-09-04 at 09:00 -0400, Jesse Keating wrote:
> On Tue, 04 Sep 2007 07:59:08 -0500
> "David G. Mackay" <mackay_d at bellsouth.net> wrote:
> > The move to Centos or RHEL is due more to the switch from a
> > development phase to production. I simply want the longer life cycle.
> > You seem to be saying that it's alright for Fedora to lack useful
> > features if the features are available in RHEL. That seems to make
> > Fedora's utility as an upstream provider to RHEL somewhat less.
> I'm saying that it's Ok for Fedora to abandon compatibility layers if
> there are other viable platforms in the Fedora universe that will
> support the required software. Fedora is about moving forward, not
> dragging behind.
Why does this remind me of Pangloss in Candide? And, I have been rather
forcefully told on this list that Fedora stands alone.
More information about the fedora-devel-list