jwboyer at jdub.homelinux.org
Tue Sep 4 20:04:57 UTC 2007
On Tue, 04 Sep 2007 15:00:15 -0500
"David G. Mackay" <mackay_d at bellsouth.net> wrote:
> On Tue, 2007-09-04 at 12:23 -0400, Jesse Keating wrote:
> > On Tue, 04 Sep 2007 09:39:42 -0500
> > "David G. Mackay" <mackay_d at bellsouth.net> wrote:
> > > Why does this remind me of Pangloss in Candide?
> > I have no idea what that means.
> I see that you've been updated on that already.
> > > And, I have been
> > > rather forcefully told on this list that Fedora stands alone.
> > Perhaps it's a matter of context. It's no mystery that RHEL is a
> > derivative of Fedora, and that CentOS is a free rebuild of RHEL. To
> Last I heard, Fedora was a derivative of RHEL, and perhaps early on RH9.
> As I understand it, Red Hat expects Fedora to be an upstream provider.
> One of several.
Um, no. In fact, these days it's often the opposite. RHEL is a
derivative of Fedora.
More information about the fedora-devel-list