Python 3.0

[Nicolas Mailhot]

Le mardi 04 septembre 2007 à 16:01 -0500, David G. Mackay a écrit :
> On Tue, 2007-09-04 at 16:08 -0400, Jesse Keating wrote:
> > On Tue, 04 Sep 2007 15:00:15 -0500
> > "David G. Mackay" <mackay_d at bellsouth.net> wrote:
> > 
> > > Last I heard, Fedora was a derivative of RHEL, and perhaps early on
> > > RH9.
> > 
> > Then you've been sadly misinformed.  Red Hat Enterprise Linux has
> > always been built from either Red Hat Linux of the day, or Fedora.
> > Never (that I am aware of) have we taken an existing RHEL and turned it
> > into RHL or Fedora.
> 
> No.  I was thinking specifically of FC1.  Since all of the succeeding
> Fedora releases build on each other, they are all, in that sense derived
> from RHEL and RH9.  Of course, you could claim that everything for FC1
> was conjured into existence independently, which would give a whole new
> meaning to "installation wizard".

What Jess told you is FC1 = RHL10
The RHEL releases are branches of the RHL/FC/F trunk (once could say
dead branches as they are rebased from the free line periodically), and
Fedora is certainly not derived from them

-- 
Nicolas Mailhot
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 197 bytes
Desc: Ceci est une partie de message num?riquement sign?e
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/fedora-devel-list/attachments/20070904/28d97cac/attachment.sig>