Can't even rebuild ocaml-labgl
jkeating at redhat.com
Wed Sep 5 11:08:05 UTC 2007
On Wed, 05 Sep 2007 09:48:50 +0100
"Richard W.M. Jones" <rjones at redhat.com> wrote:
> This is plain weird. It seems to me that someone could create a
> package with a bogus "Provides: glibc" which was otherwise
> uninstallable and bring the whole distribution to a halt. Is there
> not a way to say "I do _not_ want this package, whatever that package
> may claim about its provides"?
I think what might be best here is to just untag the improperly built
package, and replacing it with an older version. Can you send mail to
'rel-eng at fedoraproject.org' with what build needs to "go away" and
which build should take it's place? It's just a simple case of
Fedora -- All my bits are free, are yours?
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: not available
More information about the fedora-devel-list