Plan for tomorrows (20070906) FESCO meeting

[Christopher Brown]

On 06/09/07, Ralf Corsepius <rc040203 at freenet.de> wrote:
>
> On Wed, 2007-09-05 at 22:32 -0400, Jesse Keating wrote:
> > On Wed, 05 Sep 2007 17:41:02 -0700
> > Peter Gordon <peter at thecodergeek.com> wrote:
> >
> > > On Wed, 2007-09-05 at 19:49 -0400, Brian Pepple wrote:
> > > > Probably, though I'm against killing it. I'll probably bring this
> > > > up for discussion at the end of the meeting, since we have some
> > > > other topics that are a lot more pressing.
> > >
> > > Yeah, I'm against killing it for the same reasons as have been stated.
> > > Just was curious, that's all. :)
> >
> > How's this for odd.  We asked to kill it on -maintainers and nobody
> > objected.  We blurb about it on -devel and now we get objections?
> Because subscription to -maintainers isn't mandatory?
>

Although it is for maintainers of course.

Essentially, maintainers (or those subscribed to the maintainers list) have
asked for it to be closed. Now the discussion moves to -devel and developers
want it left open. Those arguing in favour of leaving -maintainers open are
not subscribed to it (or have missed the rather long thread on the subject -
unlikely) so its difficult to understand how they can appreciate the issue
of crosstalk that is happening. I'm also in favour of -maintainers closure
FWIW or at least would be interested to hear how the line between the two
lists (or a replacement) could be more definitive.

Cheers
Chris

-- 
http://www.chruz.com
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/fedora-devel-list/attachments/20070906/58c64b6c/attachment.htm>