[Guidelines Change] Emacs Guidelines

Akira TAGOH tagoh at redhat.com
Thu Sep 13 14:22:08 UTC 2007

>>>>> On Wed, 12 Sep 2007 11:54:19 +0100,
>>>>> "JU" == "Jonathan Underwood" <jonathan.underwood at gmail.com> wrote:

JU> On 12/09/2007, Akira TAGOH <tagoh at redhat.com> wrote:
>> >>>>> On Tue, 11 Sep 2007 14:24:25 -0400,
>> >>>>> "TC" == "Tom \"spot\" Callaway" <tcallawa at redhat.com> wrote:
TC> New guidelines describing how to package GNU Emacs and XEmacs addon
TC> packages can be found here:
TC> http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Emacs
>> I just looked at that guideline and realized that the
>> template suggests making emacs-common-%{pkg} as srpm. I
>> thought CVS module name should be the same as srpm name and
>> it should be usually the same as the upstream tarball name
>> or what they prefer.  or does this mean we are going to make
>> an exception for Emacsen packages to have such CVS module
>> name?

JU> Yes - that's been the case for a long time now - this comes from the
JU> previous package naming guidelines and was discussed at length
JU> previously - please see threads on fedora-packaging recently for those
JU> references.

Ah, thank you for the reference. I entirely missed that
mailing list :/ let me read them through the archives.

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/fedora-devel-list/attachments/20070913/d55ed934/attachment.sig>

More information about the fedora-devel-list mailing list