Fedora 8 Test 2 Release Notes
myfedora at richip.dhs.org
Sat Sep 15 01:17:49 UTC 2007
On Fri, 2007-09-14 at 21:06 -0400, Jesse Keating wrote:
> Not sure that makes sense. The problem is it needs to be a library
> specific Require, so that the correct arch package will get dragged
> in. A requirement on "pulseaudio-lib" just won't cut it as that would
> be satisfied by "pulseaudio-lib.x86_64". I know there is some work
> going on in rpm5 that will do arch specific provides, maybe even
> requires to, but that is future land that we may pull into rpm.org.
> Until then we need something of a solution for Fedora 8.
Lennart or a flash-plugin guy can tell us for certain what flash-plugin
needs (I've no idea what's in pulseaudio-lib). It's most likely a
library file that it dlopen(3)'s. Perhaps flash-plugin can do a:
or some new virtual package name.
BTW, since flash-plugin is an i386 package, wouldn't a Require:
pulseaudio-lib be enough for it to require the .i386 version?
More information about the fedora-devel-list