why does yum want xulrunner?

Jesse Keating jkeating at redhat.com
Tue Sep 18 15:20:20 UTC 2007

On Wed, 19 Sep 2007 20:37:23 +0530
Rahul Sundaram <sundaram at fedoraproject.org> wrote:

> Not sure which one you are referring to. I understand X wants Y to 
> specific a direct or indirect dependency which is not the case here.
> Yum is merely indicating a repository issue in this instance.

Ok, shame on me for giving you the benefit of the doubt.  Yum update
transactions /will/ in fact bring xulrunner into the transaction set.
You could verify this yourself if you tried.  Apologies to Michael.

Jesse Keating
Fedora -- All my bits are free, are yours?
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/fedora-devel-list/attachments/20070918/1b6ed17f/attachment.sig>

More information about the fedora-devel-list mailing list