Fedora spin from RpmFusion
mmcgrath at redhat.com
Sat Sep 29 01:22:36 UTC 2007
Douglas McClendon wrote:
> Rahul Sundaram wrote:
>> (The following really has been asked and answered in numerous times
> But technology and published legal guidelines change...
>>> C. An respin with no affiliation with Red Hat/Fedora is made that
>>> the "questionable packages and repos" and the user does not have to
>>> do any work from his half ( work out of the box solution )
>> If this is done, it should be rebranded and not called Fedora.
> 'should' is one of those words...
> By my reading of the current trademark guidelines (before they
> disappeared from
This now exists here though I don't know who maintains it or if it is
accurate. Can anyone clarify?
More information about the fedora-devel-list