Fedora spin from RpmFusion

Mike McGrath mmcgrath at redhat.com
Sat Sep 29 01:22:36 UTC 2007

Douglas McClendon wrote:
> Rahul Sundaram wrote:
> >
>> (The following really has been asked and answered in numerous times 
>> before...)
> But technology and published legal guidelines change...
>>> C. An respin with no affiliation with Red Hat/Fedora is made that 
>>> include
>>>    the "questionable packages and repos" and the user does not have to
>>>    do any work from his half ( work out of the box solution )
>> If this is done, it should be rebranded and not called Fedora.
> 'should' is one of those words...
> By my reading of the current trademark guidelines (before they 
> disappeared from
> http://rhold.fedoraproject.org/About/legal/trademarks/guidelines/

This now exists here though I don't know who maintains it or if it is 
accurate.  Can anyone clarify?



More information about the fedora-devel-list mailing list