Fedora spin from RpmFusion

[Mike McGrath]

Douglas McClendon wrote:
> Rahul Sundaram wrote:
> >
>> (The following really has been asked and answered in numerous times 
>> before...)
>
>
> But technology and published legal guidelines change...
>
>
>>> C. An respin with no affiliation with Red Hat/Fedora is made that 
>>> include
>>>    the "questionable packages and repos" and the user does not have to
>>>    do any work from his half ( work out of the box solution )
>>
>> If this is done, it should be rebranded and not called Fedora.
>
>
> 'should' is one of those words...
>
> By my reading of the current trademark guidelines (before they 
> disappeared from
>
> http://rhold.fedoraproject.org/About/legal/trademarks/guidelines/
>

This now exists here though I don't know who maintains it or if it is 
accurate.  Can anyone clarify?

http://fedoraproject.org/legal/trademarks/guidelines/

    -Mike