Fedora spin from RpmFusion

[Rahul Sundaram]

Bill Nottingham wrote:

> The guidelines were specifically designed so that someone could ship
> stock Fedora and an additional repository of vendor packages, whether
> it be Dell addons, Creative Commons content or whatever. 
> 
> If those guidelines are followed, then, without actually changing the
> guidelines, it doesn't really matter what that content/packages are.

That is indeed my implicit question. Do you still want vendors to ship 
software not included in Fedora and still call it Fedora? Is it ok for 
anyone and everyone to do so with any set of software? Does the current 
trademark guidelines match the goals of the project?

Rahul