Feature or bug? (strange?) yum behaviour
Mark
markg85 at gmail.com
Wed Apr 2 14:38:43 UTC 2008
2008/4/2, James Antill <james at fedoraproject.com>:
>
> On Wed, 2008-04-02 at 13:36 +0200, Mark wrote:
> > What i was saying
> > here is that yum first needs to download/update it's local data to
> > tell something that it could have easily done with rpm -q gimp.
>
>
> For:
>
> yum list installed gimp
>
> ...current upstream is now fixed and won't download/update the repo.
> metadata, "yum list installed" hasn't for a long time but any extra
> args. broke the test (and yes, this would have been better as a BZ ...
> but thanks anyway :).
>
BZ's are (nearly) always better but i wasn't sure yet if it was a bug
(like the title of this topic says).
And no problem.
Thanx for fixing it.
More information about the fedora-devel-list
mailing list