SNI support for mod_ssl
Ken Dreyer
ktdreyer at ktdreyer.com
Mon Apr 21 22:26:35 UTC 2008
On Fri, Apr 18, 2008 at 10:24 PM, Matt Domsch <Matt_Domsch at dell.com> wrote:
>
> On Sat, Apr 19, 2008 at 12:12:05AM -0400, Ken Dreyer wrote:
> > Hello,
> >
> > I was hoping the Fedora Apache maintainers would consider including
> > the following patch into httpd for F9 (or F10):
> >
> > https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=34607
> >
> > specifically, the patch for httpd 2.2.x is:
> >
> > http://people.apache.org/~fuankg/diffs/httpd-2.2.x-sni.diff
> >
> > This feature would really open up mod_ssl for certain name-based
> > virtualhost situations. It requires OpenSSL >= 0.9.8f, but F9 already
> > has 0.9.8g!
>
> I'd recommend you file it as a bug in bugzila, note it is an enhancement
> request. This way the apache maintainers/co-maintainers will see it
> and be reminded regularly when they look at bugzilla.
Thanks for the recommendation, I did so here:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=443513
> How likely is apache 2.4 to be released before the feature freeze for
> Fedora 10 (e.g. ~4-5 months from now), whereby Fedora could pick this
> up "for free" then?
I wish I knew! httpd is not on a timed release schedule. Earlier this
month on the httpd dev list there was a rather long discussion on that
subject, but from what I could tell they didn't reach a consensus.
- Ken
More information about the fedora-devel-list
mailing list