Java debugging
Andrew Haley
aph at redhat.com
Tue Apr 29 17:20:25 UTC 2008
Jerry James wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 29, 2008 at 2:38 AM, Andrew Haley <aph at redhat.com> wrote:
>> Most of this should not be necessary. We have, or had, a modified version of
>> ecj that always generates debuginfo when an RPM is being compiled, so
>> if there exists any RPM that is missing debuginfo, that is a regression.
>>
>> Also, when AOT-compiling, we should be generating the full paths for all
>> the source files and therefore all the sources should be in the debuginfo
>> packages.
>>
>> Please tell me which package is missing these, and I'll find out which
>> of these mechanisms has broken.
>
> axis-debuginfo-1.2.1-2jpp.7.fc7.x86_64.rpm which, despite the name, is
> the current package for F8. It looks like it was generated before the
> fix went in.
Right, that makes sense.
> Dare I suggest a rebuild of all Java packages of sufficient age?
You can suggest it, but I doubt that it's worthwhile. After all, it's
easy for anyone to rebuild the package. Trouble is, they have know way
to know that's all they have to do; I know of no easy solution for that.
Andrew.
More information about the fedora-devel-list
mailing list