How to get the cvs flag

[Toshio Kuratomi]

Tom "spot" Callaway wrote:
> On Fri, 2008-04-04 at 12:38 -0700, Chris Weyl wrote:
>> On Fri, Apr 4, 2008 at 12:00 PM, Tom spot Callaway <tcallawa at redhat.com> wrote:
>>> On Fri, 2008-04-04 at 12:55 -0600, Jerry James wrote:
>>>  > What feature of a bug report makes the cvs flag show up?  I need that flag here:
>>>  >
>>>  > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=440639
>>>  >
>>>  > I see the flag on bugs with the "Package Review" component, but that
>>>  > component doesn't seem to be available when the product is "Fedora
>>>  > EPEL".  This question is not answered in the text I get when pressing
>>>  > the "Help" button, either.
>>>
>>>  Weird. Maybe bugs under Fedora EPEL don't expose that. Dave?
>> Shouldn't all branch requests be handled through the master review
>> bug, which would only live on the Fedora side?
> 
> In this specific case, yes, but it is possible to hit the following
> scenarios:
> 
> 1. Package only lives in EPEL
> 2. No master review bug exists.
> 
I am somewhat inclined to disagree with a package living only in EPEL. 
EPEL packages are Fedora packages built and/or modified for Enterprise 
Linux.

If someone would like to code it, or even just provide a mockup (where 
it belongs in the URL hierarchy, form elements, who should be allowed 
etc), there's an open ticket to do this via the packagedb in the future. 
  Having the fields added to a web form means that cvsadmins wouldn't 
have to spend time cut and pasting the values which would be greatly 
appreciated by all the cvsadmins I know.

-Toshio

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/fedora-devel-list/attachments/20080404/21f7aadc/attachment.sig>