How is the new networking world supposed to work?
Dan Williams
dcbw at redhat.com
Mon Apr 14 14:40:08 UTC 2008
On Fri, 2008-04-11 at 18:13 -0700, Andrew Farris wrote:
> Alan wrote:
> >> On Sat, 2008-04-12 at 01:16 +0200, Dennis Jacobfeuerborn wrote:
> >>> Since the latest rawhide updates I now don't get a network connection
> >>> after
> >>> boot. I have to open a shell as root and issue a "ifdown eth0" followed
> >>> by
> >>> a "ifup eth0" to make the NetworkManager aware that there is a network
> >>> out
> >>> there. What is the proper way to configure this?
> >>>
> >>> Regards,
> >>> Dennis
> >>>
> >> I have the same problem and restarting NetworkManager is another fix
> >> that works for me.
> >
> > I have yet to get NetworkManager to use my wireless card. It does not see
> > any configurations, does not give me a way to create them, and general
> > acts like the card does not exist.
> >
> > wlassistant works fine (until the last gpm braindamage). The card is
> > using the b43 driver with the latest firmware.
>
> Have you tried using system-config-network to configure the adapter, and then
> click the NetworkManager Controlled checkbox? I'm asking because my own
> wireless card failed to be useful from NM until I did that (in fact it was
> causing NM to crash when the service started). Now after I did configure it..
> even if I remove all the configuration NM will still work fine. I'm unsure
> whether it was a bug and was incidentally fixed, or if the configuration via
> system-config-network did things I'm not reverting (but I don't think this is
> the case).
>
> Anyway, if you haven't tried that yet, configure it with the s-c-n tool then see
> whether NM can handle it fine.
NM will look in /etc/sysconfig/network-scripts/ for ifcfg files that are
there, and use those if found. However, the files must not have
NM_CONTROLLED=no in them, because that tells NM not to manage the
interface. At least at one point, system-config-network would add
NM_CONTROLLED=no by default when it edited a configuration that didn't
have that tag in it already, which caught a few people by surprise.
Dan
More information about the fedora-devel-list
mailing list