packages without internet source in fedora

[seth vidal]

On Wed, 2008-04-16 at 16:14 -0400, Jesse Keating wrote:
> On Wed, 2008-04-16 at 22:00 +0200, Patrice Dumas wrote:
> > * missing upstream: I think that fedorahosted is not right, a distro
> >   neutral place should in my opinion be better.
> 
> I don't really feel that way.  That'd be like saying code.google.com
> isn't neutral because they also do a linux distro (or have threatened
> to)

maybe I'm confused - I can see some concern about distro-specific
locations for abandoned/orphaned upstreams. But not for apps for whom
their upstream is hosted in fedorahosted. for those - it should be fine
- and not matter about the distro.

-sv