pruning the fonts list
Jens Petersen
petersen at redhat.com
Sun Apr 20 23:11:17 UTC 2008
Jeremy Katz さんは書きました:
> On Fri, 2008-04-18 at 15:57 -0400, Bill Nottingham wrote:
>> When looking over the LiveCD manifest, and where space is going, I
>> can't help but notice that a lot of it goes to fonts. Here's the
>> full list, AFAICT. The number to the left is the size of the package.
>> I think a good chunk of this could be pruned.
>
> Yes a lot of space in general ends up being used by fonts. I'd lean
> towards saying we should make things optional in comps rather than
> making explicit changes to the livecd, though from a maintenance point
> of view. Although I guess if we wanted to do it first on the livecd for
> F9 and then in general for F10 via comps, that'd be okay
Well we have argued about this before, but my take now is that we should
have Lang Support group parity across Live and standard installs: so
either we don't install all the language support groups for Live or we
should for standard installs, and then take comps from there.
Personally I would tend towards not installing all language groups for
Live and installing some Input Methods by default to compensate, which
would leave Live in a similar state to what it is now, but would drop
various fonts that are only installed by default for language support
groups.
Jens
More information about the fedora-devel-list
mailing list