Adoption of banshee

[James Bowes]

On Sun, Apr 20, 2008 at 08:10:42AM +0200, David Nielsen wrote:
> 2008/4/20, Nigel Jones <dev at nigelj.com>:
> >
> > Hi everyone,
> >
> > Just an FYI that I intend to adopt banshee
> > (https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/packages/name/banshee) so this is
> > just a courtesy message per the adoption policy.  I've offered it to spot
> > (who last updated it) via IRC so I'll await his reply before continuing.
> >
> > Regards,
> >
> >
> > Nigel
> 
> 
> 
> I would recommend taking libipoddevice and podsleuth as well, they are
> isolated dependencies that will normally require bumps at the same time and
> they are really low impact. There's an advantage to the Banshee maintainer
> owning the entire stack. Also thank you for picking this up.. I owe you a
> beer.

Likewise for ipod-sharp, as iirc banshee as of 0.13.2 requires podsleuth
and ipod-sharp, but not libipoddevice.

> 
> - David

> -- 
> fedora-devel-list mailing list
> fedora-devel-list at redhat.com
> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list

-James
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/fedora-devel-list/attachments/20080421/abc9a85e/attachment.sig>