[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]

Re: Orphaning package



On Sat, 2008-04-26 at 11:42 +0200, Thorsten Leemhuis wrote:
> On 26.04.2008 11:02, Michael Schwendt wrote:
> >
> > In the past, somebody from the old FESCO would have looked into it and
> > would have tried to talk to you and the people you have problems with.
> > Nowadays, there should also be somebody in the Fedora community or in
> > Fedora leadership with interest in keeping people happy and
> > cooperative.
> 
> Why can't FESCo handle that instead of discussing Fetures over and over?
> That how it afaics was supposed to be, as everyone wanted to keep FESCo
> when the merge happened because most people back then liked the work
> FESCO did (it IMHO could have been a lot better, but that's a different
> issue).

FESCo does handle these disputes (like we have in the past), when we are
actually made aware that there is a problem.  As far as I'm aware no one
in FESCo was ever contacted.

Later,
/B
-- 
Brian Pepple <bpepple fedoraproject org>

http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/BrianPepple
gpg --keyserver pgp.mit.edu --recv-keys 810CC15E
BD5E 6F9E 8688 E668 8F5B  CBDE 326A E936 810C C15E

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part


[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]