[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]

Re: FCoA [Was: Re: FESCO]



On 4/28/08, Patrice Dumas <pertusus free fr> wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 28, 2008 at 12:51:46PM +0200, Matej Cepl wrote:
> > On Sun, 27 Apr 2008 10:02:11 +0200, Patrice Dumas scripst:
> > > It is already the case. The rule is more or less, bring it to the lists
> > > and then to fesco. But this is costly so having propoer guidelines to
> > > follow like AWOL are better.
> >
> > Sure, but FESCO seems to be a little overloaded with just general
> > leadership stuff (deciding about features, etc.).
>
> That's exactly my point. For such issues, a specific guideline which
> allows not to involve FESCo would be better.

I respectfully disagree.  A _better_ solution would be for FESCo to
spend less time deciding features, and more time focusing on community
issues and development.

josh


[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]