Pushing cmake 2.6 to F9

Matthew Woehlke mw_triad at users.sourceforge.net
Mon Aug 25 16:00:10 UTC 2008


Michel Salim wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 15, 2008 at 5:24 PM, Kevin Kofler <kevin.kofler at chello.at> wrote:
>> Bryan O'Sullivan <bos <at> serpentine.com> writes:
>>> There are periodic threads about how pushing the new hotness to a
>>> stable release is a bad idea. This seems like a clear-cut case of why.
>>> I can understand the fellow's desire to package his window manager,
>>> but why can't it wait until F10?
>> We'll also need cmake 2.6 to push KDE 4.2 ~6 months from now. And there's more
>> and more stuff requiring 2.6 already (which is why the upgrade was requested in
>> the first place). So IMHO the sooner it gets into F9, the better.
>>
> Will KDE 4.2 be pushed into F-9, though? I understand the rationale
> for upgrading F-9's KDE to 4.1, but 4.2?

Speaking of... where *is* KDE 4.1 for F9? Is it not in the system yet? 
All I see seems to be 4.0.5.

-- 
Matthew
Person A: It's an ISO standard.
Person B: ...And that means what?
   --mal (http://theangryadmin.blogspot.com/2008/04/future.html)




More information about the fedora-devel-list mailing list