Package EVR problems in Fedora 2008-08-01

[Sam Varshavchik]

Jesse Keating writes:

> On Fri, 2008-08-01 at 18:23 -0400, Sam Varshavchik wrote:
>> Normally, messages from <buildsys at fedoraproject.org> that I get are various 
>> build-related stuff just for my package, and I filter them in their own 
>> bucket. These new EVR validator messages also carry the same return address, 
>> but are not regarding my package. Does it make sense to use the same From: 
>> address for stuff that's not necessarily related to your packages?
> 
> Hrm, I'm using the same address to send individual messages to people as
> well as the report message to the list.  There are a couple addresses we
> have to use, one is rawhide@ and the other is buildsys at .  Sending from
> rawhide@ didn't make much since to me since this covers more than just
> rawhide.

Do you set the To: header for individual messages?  If so, I'll just filter 
based on the To: header.


-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 197 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/fedora-devel-list/attachments/20080801/cace31cd/attachment.sig>