Pushing cmake 2.6 to F9

[Orion Poplawski]

Bryan O'Sullivan wrote:
> Yes, I object. It has some substantial incompatibilities with cmake
> 2.4.8 that break some of the software I work on (Second Life). The
> bugs in question are fixed in 2.6.1, but I don't think it would be a
> good idea to build and push that, either: you'll break *someone*
> unexpectedly, and they won't be reading this list until it's too late.
> 

2.6.1 is what would be pushed.  The request is here:

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459243

At some point we're going to be holding back new stuff more than we are 
breaking existing stuff, but I don't know when that point will be. 
2.6.X has been in rawhide since Mar 28 so it's been beaten on for a while.

Any other comments?

-- 
Orion Poplawski
Technical Manager                     303-415-9701 x222
NWRA/CoRA Division                    FAX: 303-415-9702
3380 Mitchell Lane                  orion at cora.nwra.com
Boulder, CO 80301              http://www.cora.nwra.com