GNUstep filesystem layout discussion

Axel Thimm Axel.Thimm at ATrpms.net
Sun Aug 24 13:16:04 UTC 2008


On Sun, Aug 24, 2008 at 02:50:38PM +0200, Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski wrote:
> > Axel, what do you think? Seems like keeping the unflattened layout
> > might be too much trouble; if we are already flattening /usr/bin and
> > /usr/lib*, might as well stick with a flattened layout after all.
> 
> I'm not Axel, but I second this. ;)

But please understand that we would then have chosen between
libfoundation and gnustep-base, e.g. only one would be allowed in
Fedora world. And thus only one subset of application packages would
survive.

unflattened != multiarch
unflattened == choose libcombo at runtime
flattened == choose libcombo at buildtime
-- 
Axel.Thimm at ATrpms.net
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 197 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/fedora-devel-list/attachments/20080824/5018073a/attachment.sig>


More information about the fedora-devel-list mailing list