rpms/git/devel .cvsignore, 1.63, 1.64 git.spec, 1.70, 1.71 sources, 1.63, 1.64

[Josh Boyer]

On Fri, Aug 29, 2008 at 11:56:55AM -0400, Todd Zullinger wrote:
>> Though an F-9 update will not.  You just don't yank out commands
>> like that from a stable release.
>
>Yeah, I fully agree.  And that said, is there a compelling reason to
>push git-1.6.0 as an F9 update¹ (aside from "we always have to have the
>very latest release" mantra that many users chant)?  F9 should be fine
>with git-1.5.6.x, shouldn't it?

It fixes a security bug, but I think a later release of 1.5.6.x does as
well.

josh