rawhide report: 20081128 changes

Richard W.M. Jones rjones at redhat.com
Thu Dec 4 12:34:54 UTC 2008


On Thu, Dec 04, 2008 at 07:27:12AM -0500, Josh Boyer wrote:
> It's more about not flooding the rawhide reports with a sea of OCaml
> broken dep emails.  That decreases readability for others looking for
> things they can fix.  (Aside from the primary concern of just wanting
> to get OCaml fixed too.)

Isn't it redundant for the rawhide report to show more than one broken
package dependency anyway?  Certainly if the deps that are broken come
from the same package ...

Anyway, I'm rebuilding some now.

Rich.




More information about the fedora-devel-list mailing list