Work needed, how you can help!
Daniel P. Berrange
berrange at redhat.com
Sun Dec 7 22:09:18 UTC 2008
On Sun, Dec 07, 2008 at 01:22:46PM -0800, Jesse Keating wrote:
> rpm recently began auto-discovering requirements based on contents of
> pkg-config files (.pc). This is awesome stuff, and will help developers
> out a lot. However because of this, non-devel packages are suddenly
> requiring pkg-config deps, and pkgconfig itself.
>
> This is due to packages having their .pc file in the base package rather
> than a -devel subpackage. There is a review guideline for this ( tail
> end of http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/ReviewGuidelines ) but I
> couldn't find the matching Guideline entry so it's not surprising that
> this could have been missed.
>
> The work needed is for somebody to examine all the packages in rawhide
> that provide .pc files and ensure proper placement of them based on the
> review guideline. This will likely require interaction with the
> packages maintainer(s) so the first step should probably be to produce a
> list of packages that ship .pc in a non -devel package and send the list
> (sorted by maintainer) to here so that we can discuss and pick off
> items.
FYI, a reminder to anyone generating reports on this... All Mingw
packages are effectively developement packages, so it is expected
that the base mingw32-XXXX RPM contains the .pc file.
Regards,
Daniel
--
|: Red Hat, Engineering, London -o- http://people.redhat.com/berrange/ :|
|: http://libvirt.org -o- http://virt-manager.org -o- http://ovirt.org :|
|: http://autobuild.org -o- http://search.cpan.org/~danberr/ :|
|: GnuPG: 7D3B9505 -o- F3C9 553F A1DA 4AC2 5648 23C1 B3DF F742 7D3B 9505 :|
More information about the fedora-devel-list
mailing list