What Fedora makes sucking for me - or why I am NOT Fedora

Stephen Warren s-t-rhbugzilla at wwwdotorg.org
Thu Dec 11 05:57:15 UTC 2008


Arthur Pemberton wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 10, 2008 at 11:49 PM, Stephen Warren
> <s-t-rhbugzilla at wwwdotorg.org> wrote:
>> Kevin Kofler wrote:
>>> Jesse Keating wrote:
>>>> Seriously, if we could actually just focus on bugfixing for our released
>>>> trees, do the new package work in rawhide (and bugfixing of the new
>>>> packages there), our released trees might actually stabilize outside of
>>>> the heavy handed forced freezes during development.
>>> But often it's impossible to fix some bugs without a version upgrade. For
>>> example, the upgrade to KDE 4.1 in F9 fixed many bugs in 4.0.
>>
>> That's an argument for not having introduced the alpha/beta-quality
>> release KDE 4.0 into Fedora in the first place.
> 
> And that's an arguement for turning Fedora into something useless.

What, usable software is useless? You can't possibly argue that KDE 4.0
was a good choice given the need to replace it with 4.1 so quickly.




More information about the fedora-devel-list mailing list