Fedora QA ? - Re: What Fedora makes sucking for me - or why I am NOT Fedora
Jeff Spaleta
jspaleta at gmail.com
Thu Dec 11 17:04:16 UTC 2008
On Thu, Dec 11, 2008 at 6:55 AM, Rex Dieter <rdieter at math.unl.edu> wrote:
> Shrug, karma is optional. Many maintainers appreciate it (I do), if you
> don't, then don't use it.
Technically.... bugzilla is optional too. I'm doing a good job of ignoring it.
And I think this line of argumentation is sort of moot. I think the
problem is we aren't getting enough feedback into bodhi to know
whether or not bodhi is competing with bugzilla.
I don't think the problem is the design of bodhi "the webservice", I
think the problem is we don't have a streamlined way to pull feedback
from users in a timely manner to impact updates-testing.
In aggregate how many karma votes do we get averaged for all current
updates-testing packages in a given week?
1) We need bodhi integration into PK, so people who choose to use
updates-testing get timely reminders and client side help in send in
feedback for each and every update in testing they consume.
2) We need updates-testing enablement to be an in your face install
time option, where we make the case to users to use updates-testing to
help other users avoid problems
3)...
4) profit
-jef
More information about the fedora-devel-list
mailing list