Stability and Release Cycles - An Idea
Les Mikesell
lesmikesell at gmail.com
Mon Dec 22 21:48:05 UTC 2008
Rahul Sundaram wrote:
>
> That wasn't my question. My question is why not just use RHEL or CentOS
> if you just going to duplicate the same stream of updates for Fedora as
> well? It just seems busy work for no benefit.
That's precisely what I want to end up doing, but without the disruptive
need to re-install and figure out what all those differences you are
describing as problems are. And I'd rather not wait until the Centos
release to start planning local development. I suspect many others have
a similar development cycle and need about as much time as fedora itself
to arrive at something suitable for another long-term starting point.
So, the question is whether someone who understands all the internals
can plan a clean transition path and do it once, or whether every end
user that needs stability has to muddle through it separately.
--
Les Mikesell
lesmikesell at gmail.com
More information about the fedora-devel-list
mailing list