Status of libtool 2.2.X?
Patrice Dumas
pertusus at free.fr
Fri Dec 5 01:09:42 UTC 2008
On Thu, Dec 04, 2008 at 06:09:57PM -0600, Matthew Woehlke wrote:
>
> expect to see third-party flavors of CMake (the way you see various
> vendor versions of e.g. sed, which have no relation to each other
> besides the degree to which they implement the POSIX spec for such tool).
Why so? There could be a solaris cmake, an IRIX cmake, an HP-UX cmake...
> Again, *what* "vendor cmake"? There is no such thing.
There could be. Why are there vendor sh, sed and awk?
> Cost of porting CMake: on POSIX platforms, about the same as autotools
> or better, and unlike autotools, doable for non-UNIX-like platforms.
All the GNU POSIX utilities are portable and have been ported on many
platforms.
I don't know exactly where to check, but I guess that there were even VMS
versions of GNU sed, awk and so on, and also apollo versions and so on.
--
Pat
More information about the fedora-devel-list
mailing list