The looming Python 3(000) monster
James Antill
james at fedoraproject.org
Fri Dec 5 15:32:19 UTC 2008
On Fri, 2008-12-05 at 15:09 +0000, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
> IMHO the only viable option is to maintain both python 2.x and 3.x
> in parallel. It is essentially a brand new language which just
> happens to share the same base name. Like Perl 5 & Perl 6.
It's much less like Perl-5/Perl-6, IMO, but even if you convince FESCo
of this mental contortion and you have dual sets of _every_ python
module. The API is very similar and uses the same shared library
name ... so what do you do about all the C programs that link with
libpython?
repoquery --whatrequires 'libpython2.5.so.*'
...are you going to offer two versions of rhythmbox?
--
James Antill <james at fedoraproject.org>
Fedora
More information about the fedora-devel-list
mailing list