On Fri, 2008-12-05 at 10:06 -0600, Arthur Pemberton wrote: > On Fri, Dec 5, 2008 at 8:42 AM, Michael DeHaan <mdehaan redhat com> wrote: > > > > We're just now dealing with Python 2.6, but over on the radar is perhaps one > > of the most incompatible upgrades to the language we've seen in Python 3. I > > personally haven't tried it yet, but it /aims/ to be incompatble, which is > > perhaps one of the most glaring signs a language designer has lost it that > > I've seen. > > > Was that last line really necessary for your post? The implicit looming flamewar here should be taken upstream. Fedora policy is to follow upstream, wherever it may take us.
Description: This is a digitally signed message part