More PATH fallout. Who decided this was a good idea?

[Jesse Keating]

On Sun, 2008-12-07 at 17:00 +0000, Miloslav Trmač wrote:
> More exactly, it is "after admins stop playing nice, all bets are off".
> The system is supposed to audit all attempts to violate the security
> policy up to the first successful violation, 

But only through pre-approved interfaces... what if the admin doesn't
use any of those for their first attempts?  (why would an admin use any
of those?)

-- 
Jesse Keating
Fedora -- Freedom² is a feature!
identi.ca: http://identi.ca/jkeating
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 197 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/fedora-devel-list/attachments/20081207/df5e6191/attachment.sig>